0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

Mistral Small 3
vs
Mixtral 8x7b Instruct
Mistral Small 3A

Mistral Small 3

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Mixtral 8x7b InstructB

Mixtral 8x7b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecMistral Small 3Mixtral 8x7b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
Mistral Small 3
$0.00 /mo
Mixtral 8x7b Instruct
$0.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for Mistral Small 3 and Mixtral 8x7b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
[Mistral Small 3](/models/mistralai--mistral-small-3) is a 24B dense model; [Mixtral 8x7B Instruct](/models/mistralai--mixtral-8x7b-instruct) is an MoE model activating ~13B of its 47B parameters per forward pass. On shared-infrastructure providers, they price within 10–20% of each other — but Mixtral 8x7B has been on the market longer and benefits from fierce supply competition, often landing cheaper on commodity endpoints. Throughput characteristics differ. Mixtral 8x7B's sparse activation means higher tokens-per-second on the same GPU footprint in throughput-optimized deployments. Mistral Small 3's smaller, denser architecture gives it more consistent time-to-first-token at low batch sizes, which matters for interactive use. **Where Mixtral 8x7B Instruct wins:** Batch inference at scale — translation, classification, summarization pipelines — where tokens-per-dollar is the primary metric and you're running large batch sizes. Its wide provider availability also means you can shop aggressively for spot pricing. **Where [Mistral Small 3](/models/mistralai--mistral-small-3) wins:** Applications requiring instruction following, structured output, or multi-turn coherence. Mistral Small 3's post-training improvements yield noticeably better tool-call accuracy and format adherence, making it the right default for function-calling APIs and lightweight agent scaffolds. Pick Mixtral 8x7B Instruct if you need maximum tokens-per-dollar on offline batch workloads and format consistency isn't critical. Pick Mistral Small 3 if you're building interactive features — chat, tool use, structured extraction — where instruction reliability outweighs marginal cost savings.
Related comparisons
Full model details