0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

Mistral Small 3
vs
Solar Pro 22b
Mistral Small 3A

Mistral Small 3

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Solar Pro 22bB

Solar Pro 22b

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecMistral Small 3Solar Pro 22b
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens

Add a third model to compare

Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
Mistral Small 3
$0.00 /mo
Solar Pro 22b
$0.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for Mistral Small 3 and Solar Pro 22b using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
[Mistral Small 3](/models/mistralai--mistral-small-3) is a 24B dense model with broad multilingual coverage; [Solar Pro 22B](/models/upstage--solar-pro-22b) is Upstage's 22B model built on a depth-upscaling architecture that extracts more capacity per parameter than standard stacking. Both sit in the sub-30B tier, but their price-to-capability profiles differ in practice. Solar Pro 22B typically prices 20–35% higher than Mistral Small 3 on available providers, and provider availability is narrower — Upstage's model appears on fewer commodity endpoints, which limits your ability to shop for the lowest rate. Where it earns that premium is on specific verticals: Solar Pro 22B was heavily optimized on enterprise document understanding and Korean/English bilingual tasks, and shows measurable quality gains on those workloads. **Where [Mistral Small 3](/models/mistralai--mistral-small-3) wins:** General-purpose API products requiring broad language coverage, consistent instruction following, and competitive pricing across multiple providers. Its stronger ecosystem support means better tooling, more fine-tuning recipes, and more options if a provider goes down. **Where Solar Pro 22B wins:** Workloads centered on document parsing, enterprise knowledge retrieval, or Korean-language tasks. If your product is in legal tech, finance document processing, or a Korean-language market, Solar Pro 22B's domain-optimized training pays back the cost premium. Pick Mistral Small 3 if you need a reliable general-purpose small model with wide provider choice and predictable pricing. Pick Solar Pro 22B if you're targeting document-heavy enterprise workflows or Korean/English bilingual applications where its specialized training directly applies.
Related comparisons
Full model details