0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Deepseek R1
vs
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
vs
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Deepseek R1A

Deepseek R1

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Llama 3.1 405b InstructB

Llama 3.1 405b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Nemotron 4 340b InstructC

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecDeepseek R1Llama 3.1 405b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
These three models each represent a different answer to the question of what to do with a very large parameter budget. DeepSeek R1 and Llama 3.1 405B are both general-purpose models that compete on quality benchmarks; Nemotron-4 340B targets a narrower vertical. DeepSeek R1 is a 671B MoE with roughly 37B active parameters, trained with chain-of-thought reinforcement learning to produce explicit reasoning traces. It achieves strong AIME and MATH benchmark scores that rival or exceed proprietary frontier models, at a substantially lower per-token cost than hosting a 340B or 405B dense model. Released January 2025 under MIT license. Meta's Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a dense 405B model released July 2024 under the Llama 3 community license with a 131K context window. It remains among the best-performing openly licensed dense models on instruction-following and long-context tasks. The cost of hosting 405B dense parameters is real, but the Llama 3 community license and Meta's extensive provider ecosystem give it unmatched deployment flexibility. NVIDIA's Nemotron-4 340B Instruct is a dense 340-billion-parameter model released June 2024 under the NVIDIA Open Model License. Unlike the other two, it is not designed for general conversation or reasoning — its primary purpose is generating synthetic fine-tuning data at scale. The 4K context ceiling eliminates it from most document and multi-turn workloads. Provider availability concentrates on NVIDIA's NIM service. Pick DeepSeek R1 for multi-step reasoning tasks where chain-of-thought traces matter. Pick Llama 3.1 405B for general frontier-class instruction-following with broad licensing and provider options. Pick Nemotron-4 340B only if your specific need is a large dense reference model for synthetic data generation pipelines.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Deepseek R1 compare to Llama 3.1 405b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Deepseek R1, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Deepseek R1, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details