Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Deepseek R1
vs
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
vs
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Deepseek R1A
Deepseek R1
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Llama 3.1 405b InstructB
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Nemotron 4 340b InstructC
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Deepseek R1 | Llama 3.1 405b Instruct | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
These three models each represent a different answer to the question of what to do with a very large parameter budget. DeepSeek R1 and Llama 3.1 405B are both general-purpose models that compete on quality benchmarks; Nemotron-4 340B targets a narrower vertical.
DeepSeek R1 is a 671B MoE with roughly 37B active parameters, trained with chain-of-thought reinforcement learning to produce explicit reasoning traces. It achieves strong AIME and MATH benchmark scores that rival or exceed proprietary frontier models, at a substantially lower per-token cost than hosting a 340B or 405B dense model. Released January 2025 under MIT license.
Meta's Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a dense 405B model released July 2024 under the Llama 3 community license with a 131K context window. It remains among the best-performing openly licensed dense models on instruction-following and long-context tasks. The cost of hosting 405B dense parameters is real, but the Llama 3 community license and Meta's extensive provider ecosystem give it unmatched deployment flexibility.
NVIDIA's Nemotron-4 340B Instruct is a dense 340-billion-parameter model released June 2024 under the NVIDIA Open Model License. Unlike the other two, it is not designed for general conversation or reasoning — its primary purpose is generating synthetic fine-tuning data at scale. The 4K context ceiling eliminates it from most document and multi-turn workloads. Provider availability concentrates on NVIDIA's NIM service.
Pick DeepSeek R1 for multi-step reasoning tasks where chain-of-thought traces matter. Pick Llama 3.1 405B for general frontier-class instruction-following with broad licensing and provider options. Pick Nemotron-4 340B only if your specific need is a large dense reference model for synthetic data generation pipelines.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Deepseek R1 compare to Llama 3.1 405b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Deepseek R1, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Deepseek R1, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details