Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.
DeepSeek R1
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
DeepSeek R1A
DeepSeek R1
671B params · 131K context · mit
Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$400000.00
$/1M output$2000000.00
Llama 3.1 405B InstructB
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
405B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$2700000.00
$/1M output$8000000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 671B | 405B |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| License | mit | llama-3 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2024-07-23 |
| Cheapest provider | ||
| Provider | deepinfra | deepinfra |
| Input / 1M tokens | $400000.00🏆 | $2700000.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2000000.00🏆 | $8000000.00 |
Add a third model to compare
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available for either model yet.
Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month
using each model's cheapest providerWhat changes at scale
Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.
1M in · 250K out$900000.00 · $4700000.00
5M in · 2M out$6000000.00 · $29500000.00
20M in · 10M out$28000000.00 · $134000000.00
100M in · 60M out$160000000.00 · $750000000.00
Capability vs price
scatter// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload
Compare total monthly cost across providers for DeepSeek R1 and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct using your own input/output token mix.
Open workload calculator →Editor's take
Parameter count isn't the whole story here. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a 405B dense model — the largest open-weights model from Meta's 3.1 generation — with a 128K context window and strong across-the-board benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 is purpose-built for reasoning, using reinforcement learning to develop explicit chain-of-thought capability regardless of raw parameter scale.
On hosted inference, Llama 3.1 405B is one of the more expensive open-weights models to serve: dense 405B requires significant GPU RAM, and providers reflect that with $1.00–$3.00/1M input token pricing. DeepSeek R1, as a MoE-derived reasoning model, can be more cost-competitive on some providers in the $0.50–$1.50/1M range — though the extended thinking tokens add cost back in.
[DeepSeek R1](/models/deepseek--deepseek-r1) wins on formal reasoning tasks: AIME 2024, MATH-500, multi-step algorithm derivation. Its reasoning benchmark scores exceed Llama 3.1 405B despite nominally fewer parameters, which is the empirical case for RL-trained reasoning over brute-force scale.
[Llama 3.1 405B Instruct](/models/meta--llama-3.1-405b-instruct) holds the edge for broad knowledge tasks, long-context retrieval over 100K-token documents, and workloads that benefit from the dense model's general fluency and instruction-following polish. It's the better pick for creative synthesis, nuanced summarization, and tasks where you're not specifically optimizing for multi-step logic.
Pick DeepSeek R1 for reasoning-first workloads where you're benchmarking on math or logic. Pick Llama 3.1 405B Instruct for knowledge-intensive or long-context tasks where the dense parameter mass earns its cost.
Related comparisons
Full model details