0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Command R
vs
Llama 3.1 70b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 32b Instruct
Command RA

Command R

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Llama 3.1 70b InstructB

Llama 3.1 70b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 32b InstructC

Qwen 3 32b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecCommand RLlama 3.1 70b InstructQwen 3 32b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Command R, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, and Qwen 3 32B Instruct cover the 32–70B parameter range where most production teams land for capable-but-affordable inference. All three carry 131K context windows. The meaningful differences are in licensing, multilingual capability, and what the fine-tuning was optimized for. Cohere's Command R is a 35-billion-parameter model released March 2024 with explicit architectural investment in retrieval augmentation, structured tool-calling, and multi-turn coherence. Teams building grounded document Q&A systems will find the RAG-first design produces cleaner citation behavior than a general-purpose model fine-tuned for similar tasks. The CC-BY-NC license is the main friction point: commercial production deployments should use Cohere's own API, which constrains provider flexibility and introduces single-vendor dependency. Meta's Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, released July 2024 under the Llama 3 community license, is the most widely hosted model in this comparison. MMLU scores around 79–80 place it clearly ahead of 32B-class competitors on general benchmarks, and the Llama ecosystem's provider breadth means you can shop inference cost across dozens of platforms. It handles RAG competently without Cohere's specialized tooling; most teams without a specific Cohere integration will gravitate here. Qwen 3 32B Instruct from Alibaba brings the strongest multilingual performance of the three, with measurably better CJK and Arabic handling plus benchmark scores at roughly 85 percent of Qwen 3 72B at significantly lower cost. The Qwen license permits commercial use with attribution. For teams that do not need 70B parameter quality on English tasks but do need genuine multilingual depth, Qwen 3 32B is the cost-efficient path. Pick Command R for teams already in Cohere's RAG ecosystem with its specialized grounding architecture. Pick Llama 3.1 70B for general-purpose inference with maximum provider choice and Llama community licensing. Pick Qwen 3 32B when multilingual support matters more than raw English-language benchmark rank.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Command R compare to Llama 3.1 70b Instruct and Qwen 3 32b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Command R, Llama 3.1 70b Instruct, or Qwen 3 32b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Command R, Llama 3.1 70b Instruct, and Qwen 3 32b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details