0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

Command R
vs
Qwen 3 32B Instruct
Command RA

Command R

35B params · 131K context · cohere-cc-by-nc

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 32B InstructB

Qwen 3 32B Instruct

32B params · 131K context · qwen

Cheapest provideropenrouter
$/1M input$140000.00
$/1M output$550000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecCommand RQwen 3 32B Instruct
Parameters35B32B
Context window131K tokens131K tokens
Licensecohere-cc-by-ncqwen
Released2024-03-112025-04-28
Cheapest provider
Provideropenrouter
Input / 1M tokens$140000.00
Output / 1M tokens$550000.00

Add a third model to compare

Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
Command R
$0.00 /mo
Qwen 3 32B Instruct
$1800000.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $277500.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $1800000.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $8300000.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $47000000.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for Command R and Qwen 3 32B Instruct using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
Qwen 3 32B Instruct is Alibaba's third-generation general-purpose model, and it enters this comparison as the stronger all-around performer. At 32B parameters versus Command R's 35B, the two are nearly identical in size — yet Qwen 3 32B scores noticeably higher on reasoning benchmarks, benefiting from Alibaba's heavily curated multilingual training data and alignment work. The pricing differential between them is narrow on most providers, making this a capability comparison more than a cost one. Where Command R maintains a structural advantage is retrieval-grounded generation. Cohere's grounding-aware prompt format and specialized training data produce more reliable source attribution in RAG pipelines — the model is less likely to blend retrieved passages with parametric knowledge in ways that produce unsourced claims. For multilingual customer support or content moderation pipelines spanning Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and European languages, Qwen 3 32B Instruct is a strong choice. Alibaba's training data coverage across non-English languages is broader than what Cohere has published for Command R, and the reasoning quality on translated or mixed-language inputs tends to hold up better. See provider options on [Qwen 3 32B Instruct's model page](/models/alibaba--qwen-3-32b-instruct). Command R's 128K context window and retrieval-first training make it the better fit for English-language enterprise RAG over long documents — legal agreements, financial reports, technical documentation — where citation accuracy and source traceability matter. Review live rates on [Command R's model page](/models/cohere--command-r). **Pick Qwen 3 32B Instruct** for multilingual applications and general reasoning tasks. **Pick Command R** for English-language RAG with strict citation and grounding requirements.
Related comparisons
Full model details