0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Qwen 3 14b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 32b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 8b Instruct
Qwen 3 14b InstructA

Qwen 3 14b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 32b InstructB

Qwen 3 32b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 8b InstructC

Qwen 3 8b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecQwen 3 14b InstructQwen 3 32b InstructQwen 3 8b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Qwen 3 8B, 14B, and 32B Instruct are three adjacent tiers from Alibaba's Qwen 3 generation, all released under the Qwen license with commercial terms and all carrying 131K context windows. Released in 2025, the Qwen 3 series introduced a multilingual-tuned instruction head that outperforms the prior Qwen 2.5 generation on CJK and Arabic evals, which is the consistent differentiator at every tier in this comparison. The 8B is the latency-and-cost floor. It competes directly with Llama 3.1 8B on standard benchmarks while pulling ahead on multilingual evaluations. Real-time applications where time-to-first-token matters can run the 8B with sub-$0.10 per million token economics on most major providers. The trade-off is that quality on complex instruction-following and multi-hop reasoning sits below the 14B. The 14B occupies a middle tier that is often overlooked: latency and throughput are comparable to the 8B tier, but the extra parameters meaningfully improve instruction quality and long-document summarization. For teams serving East Asian or Arabic users, this is frequently the sweet spot — better multilingual fidelity than the 8B at a cost increment that closes at scale. The 32B delivers roughly 85% of the 72B benchmark results at approximately half the provider cost. It handles mixed-language coding tasks, complex retrieval over 131K context, and multi-step reasoning well. For teams that need strong multilingual performance but cannot justify 72B pricing, the 32B is the practical ceiling. Pick the 8B for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Pick the 14B for production workloads balancing multilingual quality with cost. Pick the 32B when you need near-72B quality without paying 72B rates.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Qwen 3 14b Instruct compare to Qwen 3 32b Instruct and Qwen 3 8b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Qwen 3 14b Instruct, Qwen 3 32b Instruct, or Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Qwen 3 14b Instruct, Qwen 3 32b Instruct, and Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details