0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

Phi 3.5 Moe Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 32b Instruct
Phi 3.5 Moe InstructA

Phi 3.5 Moe Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 32b InstructB

Qwen 3 32b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecPhi 3.5 Moe InstructQwen 3 32b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
Phi 3.5 Moe Instruct
$0.00 /mo
Qwen 3 32b Instruct
$0.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for Phi 3.5 Moe Instruct and Qwen 3 32b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
Phi-3.5 MoE Instruct uses a mixture-of-experts design with 16 experts and ~42B total parameters but only ~6.6B active per token — giving it MMLU scores around 78 at a fraction of the compute cost of a dense 32B model. Qwen 3 32B Instruct is a dense 32B model with MMLU in the 85–87 range, stronger instruction-following, and a 128K context window. On price, Phi-3.5 MoE's sparse activation makes it cheaper to run: $0.20–$0.45/M tokens vs $0.70–$1.20/M for Qwen 3 32B on comparable hardware. Throughput-per-dollar strongly favors Phi-3.5 MoE. Because only ~6.6B parameters activate per forward pass, providers can run it on smaller GPU footprints, enabling higher concurrent request capacity. For latency-sensitive applications handling many simultaneous users, this matters more than raw quality. **Where Phi-3.5 MoE wins:** high-QPS inference services, cost-constrained production deployments, and workloads where English reasoning quality in the MMLU 78 range is sufficient. The sparse architecture also enables faster time-to-first-token. **Where Qwen 3 32B wins:** demanding instruction-following tasks, multilingual applications, long-context document processing (up to 128K tokens), and scenarios where the 7–9 point MMLU gap translates to meaningful output quality differences. Pick [Phi-3.5 MoE Instruct](/models/microsoft--phi-3.5-moe-instruct) when you need a good-quality model at the lowest possible inference cost per token. Pick [Qwen 3 32B Instruct](/models/alibaba--qwen-3-32b-instruct) when benchmark quality, multilingual coverage, or a long context window justify the higher per-token price.
Related comparisons
Full model details