Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.
OLMo 2 13B Instruct
vs
OLMo 2 7B Instruct
OLMo 2 13B InstructA
OLMo 2 13B Instruct
13B params · 4K context · apache-2.0
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
OLMo 2 7B InstructB
OLMo 2 7B Instruct
7B params · 4K context · apache-2.0
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | OLMo 2 13B Instruct | OLMo 2 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 13B | 7B |
| Context window | 4K tokens | 4K tokens |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Released | 2024-11-21 | 2024-11-21 |
| Cheapest provider | ||
| Provider | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — |
Add a third model to compare
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available for either model yet.
Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month
using each model's cheapest providerWhat changes at scale
Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.
1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00
Capability vs price
scatter// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload
Compare total monthly cost across providers for OLMo 2 13B Instruct and OLMo 2 7B Instruct using your own input/output token mix.
Open workload calculator →Editor's take
OLMo 2 13B and OLMo 2 7B are Allen AI's fully open Apache 2.0 models — no usage restrictions, full training data transparency. The size difference is the primary decision variable: 13B delivers noticeably higher quality on reasoning and knowledge benchmarks (MMLU ~63 vs ~58 for 7B) at roughly 1.6–2× the per-token cost. Typical hosted pricing runs $0.10–$0.18/M tokens for 7B and $0.18–$0.32/M tokens for 13B, making both among the cheapest options in their size class.
Throughput scales inversely with size. OLMo 2 7B can sustain significantly higher tokens-per-second on a single A100 instance — useful when latency or concurrent request volume matters more than raw accuracy. Both models share the same tokenizer and training recipe, so swapping between them requires no prompt engineering changes.
**Where OLMo 2 13B wins:** tasks that need more reliable multi-step reasoning, summarization of longer passages, or moderately complex instruction-following. The quality gap over the 7B is consistent on structured output tasks.
**Where OLMo 2 7B wins:** embedding pipelines, rapid classification, or any high-QPS workload where cost and latency are the binding constraints. The Apache 2.0 license also makes it trivially deployable on-prem with no legal overhead.
Pick [OLMo 2 13B Instruct](/models/allenai--olmo-2-13b-instruct) when benchmark quality is the tiebreaker and cost is secondary. Pick [OLMo 2 7B Instruct](/models/allenai--olmo-2-7b-instruct) for maximum throughput per dollar on simpler workloads — both give you full model weights with zero license friction.
Related comparisons
Full model details