Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.
Mixtral 8x22b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Mixtral 8x22b InstructA
Mixtral 8x22b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 3 72b InstructB
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Mixtral 8x22b Instruct | Qwen 3 72b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | ||
| Provider | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available for either model yet.
Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month
using each model's cheapest providerWhat changes at scale
Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.
1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00
Capability vs price
scatter// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload
Compare total monthly cost across providers for Mixtral 8x22b Instruct and Qwen 3 72b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.
Open workload calculator →Editor's take
[Mixtral 8x22B Instruct](/models/mistralai--mixtral-8x22b-instruct) is an MoE model with ~39B active parameters per token from a 141B pool; [Qwen 3 72B Instruct](/models/alibaba--qwen-3-72b-instruct) is a 72B dense model with switchable thinking mode. In standard (non-thinking) mode, pricing is roughly comparable across providers. Enable thinking mode on Qwen 3 72B and effective cost per task can jump 2–4x depending on reasoning depth required.
The architectural contrast matters operationally. Mixtral 8x22B's MoE routing is fixed — every request gets the same compute profile, making cost modeling straightforward. Qwen 3 72B's per-request thinking budget adds variance to your token spend, which is either a feature (pay more only when needed) or a headache (unpredictable monthly bills) depending on your billing model.
**Where Mixtral 8x22B Instruct wins:** Throughput-heavy batch workloads where cost predictability is critical — bulk summarization, ETL pipelines, content generation at scale. Its longer market presence also means better coverage across providers, giving you more negotiating leverage on pricing.
**Where Qwen 3 72B Instruct wins:** Agentic applications, complex code generation, and multi-step reasoning tasks where Qwen 3's deeper post-training and optional thinking mode produce meaningfully better outputs. For workloads where answer quality directly drives revenue, the ability to scale compute per hard query is valuable.
Pick Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for predictable-cost batch inference with broad provider choice. Pick Qwen 3 72B Instruct when you need a model that can handle hard reasoning tasks on demand without upgrading to a 100B+ model tier.
Related comparisons
Full model details