Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.
Mixtral 8x22b Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct
Mixtral 8x22b InstructA
Mixtral 8x22b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 2.5 72b InstructB
Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Mixtral 8x22b Instruct | Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | ||
| Provider | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available for either model yet.
Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month
using each model's cheapest providerWhat changes at scale
Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.
1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00
Capability vs price
scatter// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload
Compare total monthly cost across providers for Mixtral 8x22b Instruct and Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.
Open workload calculator →Editor's take
[Mixtral 8x22B Instruct](/models/mistralai--mixtral-8x22b-instruct) activates ~39B of its 141B total parameters per token via MoE routing; [Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct](/models/alibaba--qwen-2.5-72b-instruct) is a 72B dense model. Despite Mixtral 8x22B's larger total parameter count, per-token inference cost on most providers is comparable or slightly lower — MoE's active-parameter efficiency offsets the larger memory footprint. Expect pricing within 10–20% of each other depending on provider and batch size.
Where they diverge is in throughput and domain strength. Mixtral 8x22B's sparse routing allows high tokens-per-second on throughput-optimized hardware. Qwen 2.5 72B's dense architecture, paired with Alibaba's extensive post-training on code and math, delivers measurably better results on coding benchmarks and multilingual tasks across 29+ languages.
**Where Mixtral 8x22B Instruct wins:** Batch workloads prioritizing raw throughput — content pipelines, document processing at scale, classification tasks — where tokens-per-second and provider availability matter most. Mixtral 8x22B has strong support across EU and US providers, useful for data-residency requirements.
**Where Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct wins:** Code generation, math reasoning, and non-English workloads where Alibaba's post-training investment shows in practice. If your product handles multilingual queries or developer tooling, the dense model's domain depth pays off.
Pick Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for high-throughput batch pipelines where provider variety and tokens-per-dollar are the main levers. Pick Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct for coding, math, or multilingual tasks where quality per query matters more than raw throughput.
Related comparisons
Full model details