Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Llama 3.3 70b Instruct
vs
Mistral Large 2
vs
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Llama 3.3 70b InstructA
Llama 3.3 70b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Mistral Large 2B
Mistral Large 2
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 3 72b InstructC
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Llama 3.3 70b Instruct | Mistral Large 2 | Qwen 3 72b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
Three competitive open-weights flagships for teams that want quality without paying proprietary API rates. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is Meta's December 2024 70B dense model, 131K context, and the most permissive licensing of the three under the Llama 3 community license. It is the default choice when provider flexibility and uncomplicated deployment matter — dozens of hosts carry it, and the instruction-following quality improvement over 3.1 70B is real. Fine-tuning on this base is practical on two A100s, which matters for teams customizing toward domain-specific tasks.
Mistral Large 2 is Mistral AI's 123B-parameter model from July 2024, with a 128K context window and genuine investment in European multilingual quality, function calling, and structured JSON output. The 53B parameter gap over Llama 3.3 70B translates into a measurable quality advantage on complex multi-step tasks and multilingual European text. The Mistral Research License complicates self-hosting at scale — most production deployments run through Mistral's own API, which adds a dependency but provides reliability and tooling.
Qwen 3 72B Instruct is Alibaba's April 2025 open model, matching Mistral Large 2 on English benchmarks and surpassing both competitors on CJK and Arabic language tasks. The 131K context window is comparable. The Qwen commercial license permits self-hosting and API use. For global products with significant non-English user traffic, it is frequently the best fit without a per-token premium.
Pick Llama 3.3 70B for Apache-near permissiveness and widest provider coverage. Pick Mistral Large 2 when European language quality and Mistral's function-calling API ecosystem are worth the managed-API dependency. Pick Qwen 3 72B when multilingual Asian and Middle Eastern languages are a core product requirement.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Llama 3.3 70b Instruct compare to Mistral Large 2 and Qwen 3 72b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, Mistral Large 2, or Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, Mistral Large 2, and Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details