Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B InstructA
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
8B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providergroq
$/1M input$50000.00
$/1M output$80000.00
Llama 3.2 1B InstructB
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
1B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Llama 3.2 3B InstructC
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 8B | 1B | 3B |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| License | llama-3 | llama-3 | llama-3 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-09-25 | 2024-09-25 |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | groq | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $50000.00 | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | $80000.00 | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
The Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct are all Meta open-weights models released under the Llama 3 community license, all carrying a 131K context window. The 1B and 3B represent the September 2024 Llama 3.2 generation, trimmed explicitly for edge and on-device deployment; the 8B dates from July 2024 and sits firmly in the hosted inference tier.
The 1B model is the weakest of the three by a clear margin. At one billion parameters it struggles with instruction-following and most generation-quality tasks, making it meaningful only as a latency baseline, a proxy for testing on extremely constrained hardware, or a routing-layer triage step where a small percentage of acceptable answers is acceptable. Sub-$0.05 per million tokens at most providers, but you get what you pay for.
The 3B delivers acceptable quality for classification, short-form summarization, and content moderation routing. The 131K context window is its standout feature relative to competing 3B models, making it viable for long-document classification that would otherwise require bumping up to the 8B tier. Several platforms price it below $0.10 per million tokens, which matters if you are running volume-heavy batch workloads.
The 8B is the practical baseline for teams building conversational or reasoning applications. It handles multi-step instruction-following, lightweight coding tasks, and summarization reliably, at costs that compress with provider competition. General knowledge and tool-calling are meaningfully better than either smaller variant.
Pick the 1B only for edge hardware or latency benchmarking. Pick the 3B for high-volume, quality-tolerant batch pipelines where the cost gap to 8B is worth measuring. Pick the 8B for anything that requires coherent multi-turn responses or structured output.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare to Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details