0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Llama 3.1 70b Instruct
vs
Phi 3 Medium 128k
vs
Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct
Llama 3.1 70b InstructA

Llama 3.1 70b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Phi 3 Medium 128kB

Phi 3 Medium 128k

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 2.5 72b InstructC

Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecLlama 3.1 70b InstructPhi 3 Medium 128kQwen 2.5 72b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Three models sharing a 131K context window but representing a wide spectrum of parameter counts and capability profiles. Meta's Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, released July 2024, was a milestone: the first 70B-class open model with a genuine 131K context window. MMLU scores around 79–80 and solid general-instruction-following made it the default open-weights workhorse through late 2024. Provider coverage is among the broadest for any open model. The practical note for 2026: Llama 3.3 70B from December 2024 improves instruction-following at the same footprint, and new 70B deployments should generally prefer 3.3 unless pinning to a specific weight hash. Phi-3 Medium 128K at 14B parameters is the cost-efficiency outlier. Microsoft's synthetic-data training approach closes a surprising portion of the MMLU gap to 70B models on reasoning-heavy tasks, making it attractive when per-token cost is tightly constrained. It lags on multilingual evals, open-ended generation, and knowledge breadth — but for extraction, summarization, or structured QA, the per-parameter efficiency is real. MIT license. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is the September 2024 Alibaba flagship, since superseded by Qwen 3 72B in April 2025. It remains widely deployed because fine-tuned adapters and cached prompt distributions rarely migrate quickly. MMLU and multilingual scores are competitive against Llama 3.1 70B, and CJK coverage exceeds either peer in this comparison. Pricing has started to soften as providers shift capacity toward Qwen 3. The Qwen commercial license applies. Pick Llama 3.1 70B (or preferably 3.3 70B) for the broadest hosted coverage and reliable general-purpose performance. Pick Qwen 2.5 72B when multilingual workloads, existing adapters, or pinned checkpoints tie you to the 2.5 generation. Pick Phi-3 Medium 128K when per-token cost is the primary constraint on a reasoning-focused task.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Llama 3.1 70b Instruct compare to Phi 3 Medium 128k and Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Llama 3.1 70b Instruct, Phi 3 Medium 128k, or Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Llama 3.1 70b Instruct, Phi 3 Medium 128k, and Qwen 2.5 72b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details