Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B InstructA
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
70B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providerfireworks-ai
$/1M input$220000.00
$/1M output$880000.00
Llama 3.1 8B InstructB
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
8B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providergroq
$/1M input$50000.00
$/1M output$80000.00
Llama 3.3 70B InstructC
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
70B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providerfireworks-ai
$/1M input$220000.00
$/1M output$880000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 70B | 8B | 70B |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| License | llama-3 | llama-3 | llama-3 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-07-23 | 2024-12-06 |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | fireworks-ai | groq | fireworks-ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $220000.00 | $50000.00🏆 | $220000.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $880000.00 | $80000.00🏆 | $880000.00 |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct are all Meta open-weights models released under the Llama 3 community license with 131K context windows. The 3.1 generation launched July 2024; Llama 3.3 70B followed in December 2024, targeting the same 70B hardware footprint with improved alignment. This comparison spans two parameter sizes and two generations.
The 8B is the smallest here and the cost floor. It handles straightforward instruction-following, classification, summarization, and light coding tasks, but does not match either 70B model on complex reasoning, multi-turn coherence, or structured output reliability. MMLU sits in the low-to-mid 70s. For volume-heavy pipelines where the quality difference to 70B is not user-visible, it is worth benchmarking the gap before paying 70B rates.
Llama 3.1 70B represents the first point in Meta's roadmap where 131K context arrived at a commercially accessible parameter count. MMLU around 79-80. It is a solid model for its generation but has been largely superseded within the Meta ecosystem by the 3.3 update. Teams running it in production are typically pinned to a specific checkpoint for reproducibility rather than by preference.
Llama 3.3 70B is the current default recommendation at this parameter class from Meta. The December 2024 release delivers meaningfully better instruction-following accuracy and agentic task performance at the same 70B footprint and roughly equivalent inference cost. If you are selecting between 3.1 70B and 3.3 70B for a new deployment, there is no strong case for the older version.
Pick the 8B for high-throughput, cost-sensitive pipelines. Pick Llama 3.3 70B as the default 70B-class choice. Only pick 3.1 70B if a specific weight hash is required for reproducibility.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct compare to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details