0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
vs
Mixtral 8x22b Instruct
vs
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Llama 3.1 405b InstructA

Llama 3.1 405b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Mixtral 8x22b InstructB

Mixtral 8x22b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Nemotron 4 340b InstructC

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecLlama 3.1 405b InstructMixtral 8x22b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Three large open-weights models with very different architecture and use-case profiles. The most important comparison factor here is not raw benchmark numbers — it is what each model can and cannot do in practice. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is Meta's 405B dense model from July 2024, the most capable general-purpose entry in this group. The 131K context window enables long-document analysis, contract review, and complex multi-turn tasks at a scale unavailable in the other two models here. MMLU scores ranked near the top of open models at release, and the Llama 3 community license supports commercial use. Multi-GPU serving requirements mean hosting is limited but exists on Lambda Labs, Fireworks, and a handful of others. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is Mistral AI's April 2024 mixture-of-experts model — 141B total parameters routing through 2 of 8 experts for roughly 39B active parameters per forward pass. This makes its effective inference cost significantly lower than 405B despite producing competitive benchmark scores on reasoning and coding tasks. The 64K context window is shorter than either peer but covers most practical workloads. Apache 2.0 license with broad provider support across Fireworks, Together AI, and Replicate. Nemotron-4 340B Instruct is the outlier: a 340B dense model from NVIDIA tuned specifically for synthetic data generation, with a 4K context ceiling that disqualifies it from most production inference use cases. If you are generating training datasets and need a large dense reference model on NVIDIA NIM, that is the specific scenario it addresses. Pick Llama 3.1 405B when long-context capability and frontier reasoning quality justify the serving cost. Pick Mixtral 8x22B for strong capability at much lower effective inference cost under Apache 2.0. Pick Nemotron-4 340B only for synthetic data generation tasks it was specifically designed for.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Llama 3.1 405b Instruct compare to Mixtral 8x22b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, Mixtral 8x22b Instruct, or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, Mixtral 8x22b Instruct, and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details