0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70BA

Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B

70B params · 131K context · llama-3

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Llama 3.3 70B InstructB

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

70B params · 131K context · llama-3

Cheapest providerfireworks-ai
$/1M input$220000.00
$/1M output$880000.00
Qwen 2.5 72B InstructC

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct

72B params · 131K context · qwen

Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$180000.00
$/1M output$350000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecHermes 3 Llama 3.1 70BLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Parameters70B70B72B
Context window131K tokens131K tokens131K tokens
Licensellama-3llama-3qwen
Released2024-08-122024-12-062024-09-19
Cheapest provider
Providerfireworks-aideepinfra
Input / 1M tokens$220000.00$180000.00🏆
Output / 1M tokens$880000.00$350000.00🏆
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Nous Research Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B, Meta Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct cover three distinct approaches to the 70B production tier: a community fine-tune focused on agent and reasoning tasks, Meta's own December 2024 alignment update, and Alibaba's previous-generation multilingual flagship. All carry 131K context windows and permissive licenses — Llama 3 community license for both Hermes 3 and Llama 3.3, Qwen license for the 2.5 72B. Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B is Nous Research's fine-tune of the Llama 3.1 70B base. The training recipe explicitly targets persona fidelity, XML-tagged reasoning traces, and reduced RLHF softening of system prompt adherence. For agent frameworks where tool-schema compliance, multi-turn role consistency, and explicit reasoning chains matter, Hermes 3 often outperforms the vanilla Meta instruct releases. It is a near-zero-cost swap from Llama 3.1 70B for teams already running that model. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is Meta's own response to improving 70B alignment. The December 2024 release closes some of the gap that fine-tuners like Nous were addressing, delivering better instruction-following and structured output reliability compared to the 3.1 70B baseline. For general-purpose inference where agent-specific tuning is not the primary concern, Llama 3.3 70B is a simpler choice with broader provider support and a larger fine-tune community. Qwen 2.5 72B is the multilingual standout of the three. It outperforms both Llama variants specifically on CJK and multilingual evaluations, and its 131K context is well-suited for document-length retrieval workloads. It is the standard recommendation for products serving East Asian or Arabic users at this parameter tier. Pick Hermes 3 70B for agent pipelines requiring reasoning traces and tight schema adherence. Pick Llama 3.3 70B for general-purpose production inference. Pick Qwen 2.5 72B for multilingual workloads or when East Asian language quality is a primary criterion.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B compare to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, or Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 70B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details