0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
vs
Phi 3 Mini 128k
vs
Qwen 3 8b Instruct
Granite 3.1 8b InstructA

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Phi 3 Mini 128kB

Phi 3 Mini 128k

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 8b InstructC

Qwen 3 8b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecGranite 3.1 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128kQwen 3 8b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
This group shares a long-context threshold — all three expose 128K or more context — but land at different parameter counts and are trained for distinct use cases. Granite 3.1 8B Instruct is IBM's enterprise-oriented 8B model, expanded from 4K to 128K context in its December 2024 3.1 revision. The Granite 3 design prioritizes structured output and tool-use fidelity for enterprise extraction workflows. IBM's benchmarks show strong function-calling performance, which is the primary reason to prefer it over peers in this group for agentic RAG pipelines. Apache 2.0 license, primarily hosted on watsonx.ai with some Together AI availability. Phi-3 Mini 128K weighs in at 3.8 billion parameters — roughly half the count of its peers — trained on Microsoft's curated synthetic corpus to punch above weight on reasoning and QA tasks. It holds competitive MMLU and GSM8K scores against 7B models, which makes it the most cost-efficient option in this group when the workload is structured reasoning rather than open-ended generation. MIT license with no commercial restrictions. Qwen 3 8B Instruct has the broadest benchmark profile of the three. It covers multilingual CJK and Arabic evaluation sets where neither Granite nor Phi-3 compete meaningfully, and its 131K context window combined with below-$0.10-per-million pricing makes it the default recommendation for most general-purpose tasks in this tier. The Qwen commercial license is permissive enough for most deployments. Pick Qwen 3 8B for multilingual production workloads or general-purpose tasks where benchmark breadth matters. Pick Granite 3.1 8B when enterprise function-calling and IBM tooling integration are the priority. Pick Phi-3 Mini 128K when you need the lowest inference cost and the task is primarily structured reasoning or classification.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Granite 3.1 8b Instruct compare to Phi 3 Mini 128k and Qwen 3 8b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, or Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, and Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details