Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
vs
Phi 3 Mini 128k
vs
Stable Code Instruct 3b
Granite 3.1 2b InstructA
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Phi 3 Mini 128kB
Phi 3 Mini 128k
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Stable Code Instruct 3bC
Stable Code Instruct 3b
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi 3 Mini 128k | Stable Code Instruct 3b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
All three sit under four billion parameters, but they serve different masters. Granite 3.1 2B Instruct is IBM's smallest production model — two billion parameters with a 128K context window that puts it ahead of most sub-3B alternatives on long-document classification. IBM designed the Granite 3 series with enterprise compliance in mind: structured output, tool use, and data-lineage transparency under an Apache 2.0 license. At this scale it is not competing on raw generation quality; it is competing on throughput, hosting cost, and the ability to process long documents without a larger model footprint.
Phi-3 Mini 128K from Microsoft brings 3.8 billion parameters trained on heavily filtered textbook-quality synthetic data. The training philosophy shows: it outperforms several 7B-class models on reasoning and QA benchmarks, which is the whole value proposition. The 131K context window is genuinely uncommon at sub-4B scale, and the MIT license removes commercial friction entirely. Expect weaker performance on complex multi-step reasoning and open-ended generation where scale matters more than data curation.
Stable Code Instruct 3B from Stability AI was a reasonable lightweight code-completion choice at its January 2024 release but has been largely displaced. The 16K context for fill-in-middle tasks and the Non-Commercial Community License — which requires a Stability membership for commercial use — create friction most teams will not accept when Qwen 2.5 Coder and DeepSeek Coder offer stronger benchmarks at comparable cost under permissive terms.
Pick Phi-3 Mini 128K for general reasoning and QA tasks where its benchmark-per-parameter ratio stands out. Pick Granite 3.1 2B for enterprise extraction pipelines where long context at minimal cost matters. Treat Stable Code 3B as a research artifact unless you specifically need a local fine-tuning base with permissively licensed Stack data.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Granite 3.1 2b Instruct compare to Phi 3 Mini 128k and Stable Code Instruct 3b on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Granite 3.1 2b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, or Stable Code Instruct 3b?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Granite 3.1 2b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, and Stable Code Instruct 3b?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details