0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
vs
Phi 3 Mini 128k
vs
Stable Code Instruct 3b
Granite 3.1 2b InstructA

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Phi 3 Mini 128kB

Phi 3 Mini 128k

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Stable Code Instruct 3bC

Stable Code Instruct 3b

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128kStable Code Instruct 3b
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
All three sit under four billion parameters, but they serve different masters. Granite 3.1 2B Instruct is IBM's smallest production model — two billion parameters with a 128K context window that puts it ahead of most sub-3B alternatives on long-document classification. IBM designed the Granite 3 series with enterprise compliance in mind: structured output, tool use, and data-lineage transparency under an Apache 2.0 license. At this scale it is not competing on raw generation quality; it is competing on throughput, hosting cost, and the ability to process long documents without a larger model footprint. Phi-3 Mini 128K from Microsoft brings 3.8 billion parameters trained on heavily filtered textbook-quality synthetic data. The training philosophy shows: it outperforms several 7B-class models on reasoning and QA benchmarks, which is the whole value proposition. The 131K context window is genuinely uncommon at sub-4B scale, and the MIT license removes commercial friction entirely. Expect weaker performance on complex multi-step reasoning and open-ended generation where scale matters more than data curation. Stable Code Instruct 3B from Stability AI was a reasonable lightweight code-completion choice at its January 2024 release but has been largely displaced. The 16K context for fill-in-middle tasks and the Non-Commercial Community License — which requires a Stability membership for commercial use — create friction most teams will not accept when Qwen 2.5 Coder and DeepSeek Coder offer stronger benchmarks at comparable cost under permissive terms. Pick Phi-3 Mini 128K for general reasoning and QA tasks where its benchmark-per-parameter ratio stands out. Pick Granite 3.1 2B for enterprise extraction pipelines where long context at minimal cost matters. Treat Stable Code 3B as a research artifact unless you specifically need a local fine-tuning base with permissively licensed Stack data.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Granite 3.1 2b Instruct compare to Phi 3 Mini 128k and Stable Code Instruct 3b on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Granite 3.1 2b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, or Stable Code Instruct 3b?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Granite 3.1 2b Instruct, Phi 3 Mini 128k, and Stable Code Instruct 3b?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details