Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Gemma 2 9b It
vs
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 8b Instruct
Gemma 2 9b ItA
Gemma 2 9b It
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Granite 3.1 8b InstructB
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 3 8b InstructC
Qwen 3 8b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Gemma 2 9b It | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen 3 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
Gemma 2 9B IT, Granite 3.1 8B Instruct, and Qwen 3 8B Instruct form an interesting sub-10B comparison because each brings a distinct strength: low-latency hosting, enterprise structured-output tuning, and multilingual breadth respectively.
Gemma 2 9B IT is Google DeepMind's 9-billion-parameter instruction-tuned model, released July 2024 and distilled from Gemini Ultra training data. On general benchmarks it is competitive with peers in this size class, and Groq's hosting delivers some of the lowest latency numbers available for sub-10B models. The 8K context ceiling and the non-OSI Gemma license are the main constraints to evaluate before committing.
IBM's Granite 3.1 8B Instruct ships Apache 2.0 and carries a 128K context window — the longest in this comparison. The 3.1 revision released December 2024 expanded the context from 4K, which was a significant practical upgrade for enterprise RAG pipelines and long-document extraction tasks. IBM's tuning emphasis on structured outputs and tool-use makes it a natural fit for extraction and function-calling workloads rather than open-ended generation.
Qwen 3 8B Instruct from Alibaba brings 131K context and the best multilingual coverage in the group, with measurably stronger CJK and Arabic handling than either Gemma 2 9B or Granite 3.1 8B. On reasoning benchmarks it competes at the top of the sub-10B tier. The Qwen license permits commercial use. Provider coverage has expanded steadily through 2025 and into 2026.
Pick Gemma 2 9B for low-latency short-context inference, especially on Groq. Pick Granite 3.1 8B for long-document enterprise tasks under Apache 2.0 terms. Pick Qwen 3 8B when multilingual support or CJK language quality is a deciding requirement alongside long-context capability.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Gemma 2 9b It compare to Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen 3 8b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, or Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, and Qwen 3 8b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details