0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Gemma 2 9b It
vs
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
vs
Olmo 2 7b Instruct
Gemma 2 9b ItA

Gemma 2 9b It

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Granite 3.1 8b InstructB

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Olmo 2 7b InstructC

Olmo 2 7b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecGemma 2 9b ItGranite 3.1 8b InstructOlmo 2 7b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
Three small open-weights models with genuinely different positions on the openness-to-production spectrum. Gemma 2 9B IT from Google DeepMind is the most commercially accessible of the group, with Groq-hosted inference delivering some of the lowest latency numbers available at this parameter class. Benchmark performance is roughly on par with Llama 3.1 8B for general-purpose tasks, and pricing typically lands below $0.20 per million tokens. The 8K context window is where it falls short — both peers offer dramatically longer windows. Granite 3.1 8B Instruct expanded to 128K context in its December 2024 3.1 release, immediately making it more capable than Gemma 2 9B for document-heavy RAG workloads at similar parameter counts. IBM's enterprise tuning adds structured-output and function-calling quality that shows up in agentic evaluations. Apache 2.0 license. Primary hosting is watsonx.ai, which may add operational friction for teams already committed to AWS or GCP. OLMo 2 7B Instruct is Allen AI's most open release — weights, training data, optimizer states, and evaluation code all under Apache 2.0. Benchmark numbers are competitive with Llama 3.1 8B on standard suites, but the 4K context ceiling is a genuine limitation. The audience for OLMo 2 is primarily researchers: teams that need a fully auditable training pipeline, want to reproduce results, or are building fine-tunes where data provenance is a first-class concern. Production deployment coverage is sparse compared to the other two. Pick Gemma 2 9B for low-latency hosted inference where 8K context suffices. Pick Granite 3.1 8B when long-context RAG and structured outputs are required. Pick OLMo 2 7B only when complete training-data transparency is a hard requirement — it is not the right production choice for most teams.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Gemma 2 9b It compare to Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Olmo 2 7b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, or Olmo 2 7b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, and Olmo 2 7b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details