Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Gemma 2 9b It
vs
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
vs
Olmo 2 7b Instruct
Gemma 2 9b ItA
Gemma 2 9b It
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Granite 3.1 8b InstructB
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Olmo 2 7b InstructC
Olmo 2 7b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Gemma 2 9b It | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 2 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
Three small open-weights models with genuinely different positions on the openness-to-production spectrum. Gemma 2 9B IT from Google DeepMind is the most commercially accessible of the group, with Groq-hosted inference delivering some of the lowest latency numbers available at this parameter class. Benchmark performance is roughly on par with Llama 3.1 8B for general-purpose tasks, and pricing typically lands below $0.20 per million tokens. The 8K context window is where it falls short — both peers offer dramatically longer windows.
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct expanded to 128K context in its December 2024 3.1 release, immediately making it more capable than Gemma 2 9B for document-heavy RAG workloads at similar parameter counts. IBM's enterprise tuning adds structured-output and function-calling quality that shows up in agentic evaluations. Apache 2.0 license. Primary hosting is watsonx.ai, which may add operational friction for teams already committed to AWS or GCP.
OLMo 2 7B Instruct is Allen AI's most open release — weights, training data, optimizer states, and evaluation code all under Apache 2.0. Benchmark numbers are competitive with Llama 3.1 8B on standard suites, but the 4K context ceiling is a genuine limitation. The audience for OLMo 2 is primarily researchers: teams that need a fully auditable training pipeline, want to reproduce results, or are building fine-tunes where data provenance is a first-class concern. Production deployment coverage is sparse compared to the other two.
Pick Gemma 2 9B for low-latency hosted inference where 8K context suffices. Pick Granite 3.1 8B when long-context RAG and structured outputs are required. Pick OLMo 2 7B only when complete training-data transparency is a hard requirement — it is not the right production choice for most teams.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Gemma 2 9b It compare to Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Olmo 2 7b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, or Olmo 2 7b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Gemma 2 9b It, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct, and Olmo 2 7b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details