0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

DeepSeek V3.2
vs
Mistral Large 2
DeepSeek V3.2A

DeepSeek V3.2

671B params · 131K context · deepseek

Cheapest providertogether-ai
$/1M input$270000.00
$/1M output$1100000.00
Mistral Large 2B

Mistral Large 2

123B params · 131K context · mistral-research

Cheapest provideropenrouter
$/1M input$1800000.00
$/1M output$5400000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecDeepSeek V3.2Mistral Large 2
Parameters671B123B
Context window131K tokens131K tokens
Licensedeepseekmistral-research
Released2025-05-072024-07-24
Cheapest provider
Providertogether-aiopenrouter
Input / 1M tokens$270000.00🏆$1800000.00
Output / 1M tokens$1100000.00🏆$5400000.00

Add a third model to compare

Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
DeepSeek V3.2
$3550000.00 /mo
Mistral Large 2
$19800000.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$545000.00 · $3150000.00
5M in · 2M out$3550000.00 · $19800000.00
20M in · 10M out$16400000.00 · $90000000.00
100M in · 60M out$93000000.00 · $504000000.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for DeepSeek V3.2 and Mistral Large 2 using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
[Mistral Large 2](/models/mistralai--mistral-large-2) is a dense model in the 123B parameter range, Mistral AI's flagship for enterprise reasoning tasks. [DeepSeek V3.2](/models/deepseek--deepseek-v3.2) operates at 671B total sparse MoE with ~37B active parameters — a fundamentally different compute profile. At comparable hosted providers, Mistral Large 2 runs $2–3/M input tokens; DeepSeek V3.2 frequently undercuts $0.50/M on providers with MoE-optimized kernels. On benchmark comparisons, DeepSeek V3.2 leads on MATH and competitive coding tasks, consistent with its RLHF tuning targeting reasoning depth. Mistral Large 2 holds competitive positions on multilingual benchmarks and function-calling accuracy, where Mistral's training emphasis on European language coverage and structured outputs shows tangibly. Mistral Large 2 is the choice for workloads where European data residency matters — Mistral AI offers EU-hosted inference with contractual data processing terms that most DeepSeek providers cannot match today. For GDPR-constrained pipelines, legal document analysis with EU data, or enterprise contracts requiring European provider SLAs, Mistral Large 2's provider ecosystem is more mature. DeepSeek V3.2 is the cost-performance default for reasoning, code generation, and long-context summarization without geographic data constraints. The 4–6× pricing advantage over Mistral Large 2 at equivalent provider tiers makes it difficult to justify Mistral for purely technical workloads. Pick Mistral Large 2 if European data residency, multilingual performance, or Mistral's enterprise support tier are requirements. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for general-purpose reasoning and code tasks where per-token cost is the primary optimization target and data residency is not a constraint.
Related comparisons
Full model details