Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Deepseek V3.2
vs
Llama 3.3 70b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Deepseek V3.2A
Deepseek V3.2
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Llama 3.3 70b InstructB
Llama 3.3 70b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 3 72b InstructC
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Deepseek V3.2 | Llama 3.3 70b Instruct | Qwen 3 72b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
Three of the most-discussed open-weights models in production, each representing a distinct tradeoff. DeepSeek V3.2 is a 671B-parameter MoE released May 2025 by a Chinese research lab, with approximately 37B active parameters per forward pass. That architecture keeps inference cost competitive with dense 70B models while delivering benchmark quality that rivals frontier proprietary offerings on code, math, and general reasoning. Context window is 128K. DeepSeek's own license applies, which is permissive for most commercial use but is not Apache, so enterprise legal teams will want to confirm before deployment.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is Meta's 70B dense model released December 2024 with a 131K context window and the Llama 3 community license — the closest to Apache-permissive you will find at this quality tier from a major lab. It is the default recommendation for teams that want broad provider coverage, predictable licensing, and solid instruction-following without a licensing deep-dive. Benchmark improvements over 3.1 70B are genuine, not just marketing.
Qwen 3 72B Instruct from Alibaba matches Llama 3.3 70B at the parameter tier with a competitive 131K context window and noticeably stronger multilingual performance across Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Arabic. The Qwen commercial license covers production deployment. For global products serving non-English user bases, it often performs better on the workloads that actually matter.
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 when you need the highest quality per inference dollar and can manage the licensing review. Pick Llama 3.3 70B for permissive licensing and the widest provider options. Pick Qwen 3 72B when multilingual breadth is a first-order product requirement.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Deepseek V3.2 compare to Llama 3.3 70b Instruct and Qwen 3 72b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Deepseek V3.2, Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, or Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Deepseek V3.2, Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, and Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details