0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.

Deepseek V3
vs
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Deepseek V3A

Deepseek V3

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Nemotron 4 340b InstructB

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecDeepseek V3Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens

Add a third model to compare

Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available for either model yet.

Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month

using each model's cheapest provider
Deepseek V3
$0.00 /mo
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
$0.00 /mo

What changes at scale

Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.

1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00

Capability vs price

scatter
// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload

Compare total monthly cost across providers for Deepseek V3 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.

Open workload calculator →
Editor's take
[Nemotron 4 340B Instruct](/models/nvidia--nemotron-4-340b-instruct) is NVIDIA's dense 340B model, optimized via a synthetic data pipeline and released with a permissive research license. [DeepSeek V3](/models/deepseek--deepseek-v3) is a 671B sparse MoE with ~37B active parameters — so while total parameter counts favor Nemotron at first glance, V3's active-parameter efficiency gives it a different cost profile entirely. At inference time, Nemotron 4 340B activates all 340B parameters on every token, putting it in the same cost tier as other dense 300B+ models: expect $2–5/M tokens at most providers. DeepSeek V3, by contrast, reaches sub-$0.50/M input at the cheapest hosted providers due to MoE batching efficiency. The quality-per-dollar gap is significant. Nemotron 4 340B was specifically designed with synthetic data generation in mind — its training pipeline used NVIDIA's Llama-3.1-Nemotron family for preference labeling, making it unusually well-calibrated for producing diverse, high-quality synthetic training data. If you're building a data flywheel and need a model that generates diverse, human-preference-aligned outputs for downstream fine-tuning, Nemotron is worth the premium. DeepSeek V3 benchmarks competitively against dense models several times its active-parameter cost on standard reasoning, math, and coding tasks. For production inference where you're optimizing cost-per-correct-output rather than data generation quality, V3's MoE pricing makes it the clear winner. Pick Nemotron 4 340B Instruct if your primary use case is synthetic data generation or NVIDIA-ecosystem integrations. Pick DeepSeek V3 for general-purpose production inference where per-token cost and reasoning quality determine ROI.
Related comparisons
Full model details