Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload. Both columns use the cheapest provider for that model.
Deepseek V3
vs
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Deepseek V3A
Deepseek V3
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Nemotron 4 340b InstructB
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Deepseek V3 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | ||
| Provider | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — |
Add a third model to compare
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available for either model yet.
Sample workload — 5M in + 2M out per month
using each model's cheapest providerWhat changes at scale
Output tokens dominate cost above a 1:3 input/output ratio. Below 1:1, input dominates and cheaper-input providers win regardless of headline price.
1M in · 250K out$0.00 · $0.00
5M in · 2M out$0.00 · $0.00
20M in · 10M out$0.00 · $0.00
100M in · 60M out$0.00 · $0.00
Capability vs price
scatter// scatter: benchmark × $/1M out
Calculate cost for your workload
Compare total monthly cost across providers for Deepseek V3 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct using your own input/output token mix.
Open workload calculator →Editor's take
[Nemotron 4 340B Instruct](/models/nvidia--nemotron-4-340b-instruct) is NVIDIA's dense 340B model, optimized via a synthetic data pipeline and released with a permissive research license. [DeepSeek V3](/models/deepseek--deepseek-v3) is a 671B sparse MoE with ~37B active parameters — so while total parameter counts favor Nemotron at first glance, V3's active-parameter efficiency gives it a different cost profile entirely.
At inference time, Nemotron 4 340B activates all 340B parameters on every token, putting it in the same cost tier as other dense 300B+ models: expect $2–5/M tokens at most providers. DeepSeek V3, by contrast, reaches sub-$0.50/M input at the cheapest hosted providers due to MoE batching efficiency. The quality-per-dollar gap is significant.
Nemotron 4 340B was specifically designed with synthetic data generation in mind — its training pipeline used NVIDIA's Llama-3.1-Nemotron family for preference labeling, making it unusually well-calibrated for producing diverse, high-quality synthetic training data. If you're building a data flywheel and need a model that generates diverse, human-preference-aligned outputs for downstream fine-tuning, Nemotron is worth the premium.
DeepSeek V3 benchmarks competitively against dense models several times its active-parameter cost on standard reasoning, math, and coding tasks. For production inference where you're optimizing cost-per-correct-output rather than data generation quality, V3's MoE pricing makes it the clear winner.
Pick Nemotron 4 340B Instruct if your primary use case is synthetic data generation or NVIDIA-ecosystem integrations. Pick DeepSeek V3 for general-purpose production inference where per-token cost and reasoning quality determine ROI.
Related comparisons
Full model details