0 providers50 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
vs
Refact Llama 3.1 70B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70BA

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

70B params · 131K context · mit

Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$280000.00
$/1M output$550000.00
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B InstructB

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

32B params · 131K context · qwen

Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$120000.00
$/1M output$250000.00
Refact Llama 3.1 70BC

Refact Llama 3.1 70B

70B params · 131K context · llama-3

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecDeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70BQwen 2.5 Coder 32B InstructRefact Llama 3.1 70B
Parameters70B32B70B
Context window131K tokens131K tokens131K tokens
Licensemitqwenllama-3
Released2025-01-202024-11-122024-09-01
Cheapest provider
Providerdeepinfradeepinfra
Input / 1M tokens$280000.00$120000.00🏆
Output / 1M tokens$550000.00$250000.00🏆
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
A reasoning-distilled generalist, a code-benchmark leader, and a fine-tune targeting IDE pipelines — three 32–70B models optimized for meaningfully different tasks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, released January 2025, was produced by distilling reasoning-chain supervision from DeepSeek's full 671B R1 MoE into a Llama 3.3 70B base. Independent benchmarks place it at roughly 70–80 percent of full R1's score on AIME and MATH. For code tasks, it applies chain-of-thought reasoning rather than raw code-specialist fine-tuning, which means it handles algorithmic problem-solving well but may lag purpose-built coders on autocomplete-style completions. Groq's hardware makes it one of the faster 70B options for latency-sensitive requests. MIT license — fully commercial, no usage restrictions. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, released November 2024 by Alibaba, is explicitly optimized for code: 32 billion parameters, 92 programming languages, and a 131K context window that handles multi-file codebases and larger diffs in a single pass. On LiveCodeBench and MultiPL-E it benchmarks alongside DeepSeek Coder V2. It does not do chain-of-thought reasoning in the same vein as R1 Distill, but for completion-style, agentic pipelines, and CI code generation it is the sharper tool. Qwen license covers commercial use. Refact Llama 3.1 70B, co-released by Together Computer and Refact AI in September 2024, is a fine-tune of Llama 3.1 70B focused on IDE tab-completion and agentic refactoring rather than general code generation. Its 128K context window is the key specification — it ingests large file trees for multi-file diffs without chunking. This model makes sense only if your product is an IDE extension or a refactoring agent; for general code generation pipelines, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or R1 Distill offer broader utility. Inherits the Llama 3 community license. Pick DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B for reasoning-heavy code problems that benefit from chain-of-thought. Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B for high-throughput production code generation and CI pipelines. Pick Refact Llama 3.1 70B specifically when building an IDE-as-a-product or agent loop that needs deep file-tree context.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Refact Llama 3.1 70B on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, or Refact Llama 3.1 70B?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, and Refact Llama 3.1 70B?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details