0 providers0 models

Model crosswalk

Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.

Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70b
vs
Llama 3.3 70b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70bA

Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70b

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Llama 3.3 70b InstructB

Llama 3.3 70b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Qwen 3 72b InstructC

Qwen 3 72b Instruct

Cheapest provider
$/1M input
$/1M output
Specs and cheapest providers
SpecDeepseek R1 Distill Llama 70bLlama 3.3 70b InstructQwen 3 72b Instruct
Parameters
Context window
License
Released
Cheapest provider
Provider
Input / 1M tokens
Output / 1M tokens
Benchmark comparison

No benchmark data available yet.

Editor's take
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and Qwen 3 72B Instruct are three of the strongest 70B-class open-weights models available as of 2026, but they occupy distinct positions: a reasoning-distilled specialist from DeepSeek (January 2025), Meta's updated general-purpose flagship (December 2024), and Alibaba's multilingual generalist (2025). All three run under permissive licenses — MIT for the DeepSeek distill, Llama 3 community for Meta, Qwen license for Alibaba — and all share 131K context windows. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is produced by distilling chain-of-thought supervision from the full 671B R1 mixture-of-experts model into a Llama 3.3 70B base. On AIME and MATH benchmarks it achieves roughly 70-80% of the full R1 score. If your workload involves explicit reasoning chains, step-by-step math, or tasks where showing work matters, this model outperforms both alternatives at the 70B tier. Groq hosts it with competitive latency; DeepInfra and Fireworks also carry it. MIT license means no usage restrictions for enterprise deployment. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the default general-purpose option at this parameter count. Meta's December 2024 alignment improvements deliver better multi-turn coherence, tool-use adherence, and structured-output reliability compared to the 3.1 70B. It is the broadest-supported model in this comparison across hosted providers and fine-tune communities. For applications that do not specifically require mathematical reasoning, it remains competitive. Qwen 3 72B is the multilingual ceiling of the three. It benchmarks at or above Llama 3.3 70B on English tasks while outperforming it substantially on CJK and Arabic evaluations. For products serving non-English users, the multilingual advantage is concrete. Pick R1 Distill 70B for reasoning-intensive pipelines. Pick Llama 3.3 70B for general-purpose hosted inference. Pick Qwen 3 72B for multilingual applications or workloads serving East Asian or Arabic users.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
How does Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70b compare to Llama 3.3 70b Instruct and Qwen 3 72b Instruct on price?
Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
Which model is best for coding: Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70b, Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, or Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
What is the context window for Deepseek R1 Distill Llama 70b, Llama 3.3 70b Instruct, and Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details