Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
vs
Mistral Large 2
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70BA
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70B params · 131K context · mit
Cheapest providerdeepinfra
$/1M input$280000.00
$/1M output$550000.00
Llama 3.3 70B InstructB
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
70B params · 131K context · llama-3
Cheapest providerfireworks-ai
$/1M input$220000.00
$/1M output$880000.00
Mistral Large 2C
Mistral Large 2
123B params · 131K context · mistral-research
Cheapest provideropenrouter
$/1M input$1800000.00
$/1M output$5400000.00
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Mistral Large 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 70B | 70B | 123B |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| License | mit | llama-3 | mistral-research |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2024-12-06 | 2024-07-24 |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | deepinfra | fireworks-ai | openrouter |
| Input / 1M tokens | $280000.00 | $220000.00🏆 | $1800000.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $550000.00🏆 | $880000.00 | $5400000.00 |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
A reasoning-specialist dense model, a general-purpose open-weights workhorse, and a managed-API flagship. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B takes a Llama 3.3 70B base and applies chain-of-thought supervision distilled from the full 671B R1 MoE, released January 2025. Independent evaluations place it at roughly 70–80 percent of full R1 performance on AIME and MATH benchmarks at significantly lower inference cost. MIT license means no commercial friction. Groq, DeepInfra, and Fireworks all carry it, with Groq offering particularly low latency at this parameter count. If your bottleneck is multi-step mathematical or logical reasoning and you want a 70B-class cost profile, this is the obvious pick.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is Meta's December 2024 general-purpose model — same parameter count, 131K context, Llama 3 community license. It outperforms the R1 distill variant on open-ended instruction following and creative tasks where explicit chain-of-thought is not the right approach. The breadth of provider coverage and permissive licensing make it the lowest-friction starting point for new projects that do not have strong reasoning requirements.
Mistral Large 2 runs at 123 billion parameters, which gives it a quality ceiling noticeably above either 70B option. It shines on multilingual structured output, function calling, and European-language quality, but costs more and requires Mistral's managed API for most production deployments under the Research License.
Pick DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B for math-heavy agents, code reasoning, or any pipeline where chain-of-thought traces are an asset. Pick Llama 3.3 70B for general workloads where Apache licensing and provider flexibility come first. Pick Mistral Large 2 when you need higher parameter capacity and are comfortable with Mistral's API ecosystem.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2 on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, or Mistral Large 2?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and Mistral Large 2?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details