Model crosswalk
Side-by-side on price, capability and workload — three-way comparison.
Command R Plus
vs
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
vs
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Command R PlusA
Command R Plus
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Llama 3.1 405b InstructB
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Qwen 3 72b InstructC
Qwen 3 72b Instruct
Cheapest provider—
$/1M input—
$/1M output—
Specs and cheapest providers
| Spec | Command R Plus | Llama 3.1 405b Instruct | Qwen 3 72b Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Context window | — | — | — |
| License | — | — | — |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Cheapest provider | |||
| Provider | — | — | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | — | — |
Benchmark comparison
No benchmark data available yet.
Editor's take
An enterprise RAG specialist, a frontier-scale dense model, and a balanced multilingual 72B — each makes sense for a different primary workload.
Cohere's Command R+ is a 104B-parameter model released April 2024, built explicitly for retrieval-augmented generation and multi-step tool use. It scores well on grounding and function-calling benchmarks, which reflects deliberate architectural and fine-tuning investment in those capabilities rather than simply scaling up. The 131K context window handles long retrieval contexts. The significant constraint is licensing: Command R+ uses Cohere's CC-BY-NC license, which prohibits commercial deployment through third-party inference hosts. Production use channels through Cohere's own API. Teams evaluating Command R+ should factor in the vendor dependency alongside the RAG-quality argument.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the largest dense open-weights model in this group at 405B parameters, 131K context, and Llama 3 community license terms that allow commercial use with attribution. MMLU scores near the top of the open-weights tier at launch, broad provider support, and the ability to self-host on sufficient hardware. The cost of inference is significantly higher than either peer — justified when the task genuinely requires frontier-level capability.
Qwen 3 72B Instruct from April 2025 covers MMLU, code, and multilingual benchmarks comprehensively at a fraction of 405B pricing. For most RAG pipelines that need broad knowledge retrieval rather than Cohere's specialized grounding stack, Qwen 3 72B is the more practical default.
Pick Command R+ when you need Cohere's grounding stack and are willing to route through their API. Pick Llama 3.1 405B when frontier capability and licensing flexibility to self-host are the priority. Pick Qwen 3 72B for general-purpose high-performance inference at reasonable 72B pricing.
Compare two at a time
Frequently asked questions
- How does Command R Plus compare to Llama 3.1 405b Instruct and Qwen 3 72b Instruct on price?
- Use the table above to compare input and output prices per 1M tokens across the cheapest available providers for each model.
- Which model is best for coding: Command R Plus, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, or Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- HumanEval and other code benchmarks are shown in the table. For production code tasks, also consider context window size and provider latency.
- What is the context window for Command R Plus, Llama 3.1 405b Instruct, and Qwen 3 72b Instruct?
- Context window sizes are listed in the Specs row of the comparison table above.
Full model details