0 providers0 models

Use-case preset

Legal document analysis cost calculator

Full-document contract review and clause extraction; 64k context, high accuracy.

Contract review and clause extraction: the full document (NDA, MSA, lease, or similar) is loaded into context alongside extraction instructions; the model identifies and summarizes specific provisions, flags risk clauses, or answers precise questions about the document's terms.

The 95/5 input/output ratio reflects the large document payload versus a focused structured extraction output. A 64k context window is required for full contracts — truncating a legal document to save tokens introduces liability. Latency is best-effort; attorneys work in review queues, not real-time UIs. `cachedPromptPercent` is ~60: the document content and extraction schema are stable if you issue multiple questions against the same contract in one session. Compliance regions: regulated industries often require US or EU hosting — configure `complianceRegion` at deployment rather than preset level. Accuracy requirements justify 70B+ models; a wrong clause extraction is costlier than the inference fee.

Recommended models

Best-in-class instruction following and reasoning for complex legal language interpretation.
Strong accuracy on structured clause extraction at ~4× lower cost than 405B; good cost/quality tradeoff.
Excellent long-context comprehension with reliable citation of specific contract sections.
Precise instruction following on extraction tasks; strong performance on European legal document formats.
Fine-tuned for structured output and instruction adherence — reliable for clause schema extraction.